LATEST DETAILS

Additional Depreciation- Assessee entitled to additional depreciation as the condition precedent of filing report of accountant in form 3AA was not filed with return but was filed during assessment proceedings before the order was passed which was a sufficient compliance- Commissioner of Income Tax vs. GM Knitting Industries P. Ltd.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

 

Civil Appeal Nos. 10782 of 2013 and 4048 of 2014.

 

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX .................................Appellant.
V
G.M. KNITTING INDUSTRIES (P.) LTD. ........................Respondent

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX ................................Appellant.
V
AKS ALLOYS (P.) LTD....................................................Respondent
 

A. K. SIKRI and ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, JJ.

 
Date :July 24, 2015
 
Appearances

Arijit Prasad, S. A. Haseeb, Ms. Swarupma Chaturvedi, Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, Ms. Gargi Khanna and Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocates, for the appellant.
Saurabh Ajay Gupta and Saurabh Singhal,Advocates, for the respondent.


Section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 — Depreciation — Additional Depreciation- Assessee entitled to additional depreciation as the condition precedent of filing report of accountant in form 3AA was not filed with return but was filed during assessment proceedings before the order was passed which was a sufficient compliance- Commissioner of Income Tax vs. GM Knitting Industries P. Ltd.


JUDGMENT


The judgment of the court was delivered by

1. It would be suffice to reproduce paragraph 2 of the impugned order whereby action of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was held to be justified in allowing the additional depreciation as claimed by the respondent- assessee herein :

"Additional depreciation is denied to the assessee on the ground that the assessee has failed to furnish form 3AA along with the return of income. Admittedly, form 3AA was submitted during the course of assessment proceedings and it is not in dispute that the assessee is entitled to the additional depreciation. In these circumstances, in the light of the judgment of this court in the case of CIT v. Shivanand Electronics reported in [1994] 209 ITR 63 (Bom), we see no merit in this appeal. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed with no order as to costs."

2. We concur with the aforesaid view of the High Court and hold that even if form 3AA was not filed along with return of income but the same was filed during the assessment proceedings and before the final order of the assessment was made that would amount to sufficient compliance. These appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.

 

[2015] 376 ITR 456 (SC),[2015] 279 CTR 534 (SC)

 
Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.