LATEST DETAILS

Power to transfer case u/s 127 was conditioned by the requirement of furnishing a reasonable opportunity of being heard, wherever it was possible to do so, to the assessee and of recording reasons-Order set aside as the conditions were not complied with

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

 

WRIT TAX No. - 16 of 2014

 

Smt. Chandra Prabha Kushwaha And Ors. ..........................................................Appellant.
V
Commissioner Of Income Tax And Another..........................................................Respondent

 

Dr. Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud and Dilip Gupta, JJ.

 
Date :January 9, 2014
 
Appearances

Dinesh Tiwari For the petitioners.
Standing Counsel for the Income-tax for the respondents.


Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 — Transfer of cases — Power to transfer case u/s 127 was conditioned by the requirement of furnishing a reasonable opportunity of being heard, wherever it was possible to do so, to the assessee and of recording reasons — Order set aside as the conditions were not complied with —

FACTS:

Assessee has challenged the validity of the order transferring the case without furnishing a reasonable opportunity of being heard or without recording nay reasons for the transfer of the case.

HELD,

That  the power to transfer case u/s 127 was conditioned by the requirement of furnishing a reasonable opportunity of being heard, wherever it was possible to do so, to the assessee and of recording reasons. The court would not express any opinion on the merits of the issue as to whether the cases were required to be centralized since that has to be determined after following the procedure prescribed u/s 127(2). Moreover, the reasons have to be spelt out in the order which has been passed u/s 127(2) which was admittedly not the case. Order was set aside. In the result, petition was answered in favour of assessee.


JUDGMENT


The petitioner has questioned the legality of an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Allahabad on 17 December 2012 under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act').

A copy of the order was received by the petitioner from the Income Tax Office, Mirzapur on 3 January 2014, as stated in paragraph-1 of the writ petition. The power to transfer a case under Section 127 is conditioned by the requirement of furnishing a reasonable opportunity of being heard, wherever it is possible to do so, to the assessee and of recording reasons. The principles in this regard are well settled and have been laid down by the Supreme Court in Ajantha Industries & Ors., Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and Ors., [1976] 102 ITR 281 (SC) and in a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Vinay Kumar Jaiswal & Ors., Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors., [1996] 221 ITR 568 (Alld).

In the present case, the impugned order dated 17 December 2012 was passed admittedly without furnishing a reasonable opportunity of being heard nor does it record any reason for the transfer of the case.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue states that reasons have been recorded in the letters dated 29 October 2012 and 5 October 2012 of the CIT (Central) Kanpur and DIR (Investigation) Kanpur. Learned counsel has relied upon a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Kerala High Court in Redwood Hotel (P) Ltd. Vs. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax [2003] 259 ITR 191 (Kerala) and submits that the cases needed to be centralized in view of the fact that a search had been carried out.

We are not inclined to express any opinion on the merits of the issue as to whether the cases are required to be centralized since that has to be determined after following the procedure prescribed under Section 127 (2) of the Act. Moreover, the reasons have to be spelt out in the order which has been passed under Section 127(2) of the Act, which is admittedly not the case here.

Hence, following the well settled position in law, we set aside the impugned order dated 17 December 2012 passed under Section 127(2) of the Act. We direct, in consequence, that the assessee shall be at liberty to file its reply to the proposed transfer of cases from Mirzapur to Allahabad within a period of two weeks from today and shall appear before the Commissioner of Income Tax at Allahabad on 23 January 2014.

We keep all issues to be decided by the Competent Authority. The fresh order may be passed in accordance with law after furnishing a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

The petition is, accordingly, allowed to the extent indicated above.

There shall be no order as to costs.

 

[2014] 361 ITR 66 (ALL)

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.