Revenue has raised the ground thatCIT(A) has erred in law in deleting the addition amounting to Rs. 4,44,11,358/- made by AO on account of difference in total sales made during the year and total cash deposits u/s 68 as the assessee has failed to explain the source of cash deposits in the bank account amounting to Rs. 4,45,53,931/-.The plea taken by the appellant that purchases in the individual capacity were also routed through the HUF and accepted by CIT(A) is not substantiated.