Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

Court is of the opinion that there was no denial of affording reasonable opportunity of being heard in the cases of the petitioners. By assigning adequate reasons therein, the petitioners were given adequate opportunities to respond to the two notices containing the proposal to transfer their cases of assessment from the ACIT, Circle – Dimapur or the ITO, Ward – I, Dimapur, as thecasemay be, in the State of Nagaland to the ACIT, Central Circle – Kollam in the State of Kerala before passing of the impugned orders dated 18.07.2018. But by not responding to the said notices, the petitioners did not avail the opportunity so granted to them by submitting their responses and, as such, the plea of denial of the principles of natural justice is found to be not tenable and sustainable. In such view of the matter, this Court does not find any good and sufficient reason to interfere with the impugned orders dated 18.07.2018 passed in exercise of the powers under Section 127(2)(a) of the Act and the consequent notice issued under Section 153A of the Act. As a result, these writ petitions are found to be bereft of merit and, accordingly, the same are dismissed. The interim order passed earlier, stands recalled. There is, however, no order as to cost.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Sec. 127 of Income Tax Act, 1961—Transfer of Case—An agreement between the two jurisdictional authorities is an essential pre-requisite to be complied with to transfer a case between them and in case of absence of such agreement, the provision of clause (b) of Section 127(2) is to be complied with for passing of an order of transfer where the Assessing Officer or Assessing Officers from whom the case is to be transferred and the Assessing Officer or Assessing Officers to whom the case is to be transferred are not subordinate to the same Principal Director or Director General or Principal Chief Commissioners or Chief Commissioners or Principal Commissioners or Commissioners. A show cause notice must convey the reasons for the proposed transfer of the case so that the assessee could make effective representation with reference to the reasons set out in the notice and a notice issued under Section 127 must prima facie show due application of mind and reasons must also be disclosed so that an effective opportunity is provided to the affected party to respond to the notice and as there was no reflection of these twin reasons in the notice and the reason as to why all the cases could not be clubbed under one ITO at Guwahati, the impugned orders of transfer of cases of the petitioner under Section 127 (2) were quashed—  M.K. Rajendran Pillai vs. Pr. CIT [ 2020] 421 ITR 274 (Gauhati)

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.