Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

Notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c) of the Act to be bad in law as it did not specify which limb of section 271(1)(c) of the Act the penalty proceedings had been initiated i.e. whether for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee. 13. Considering the facts of thecasein totality, in the light of judicial decisions referred to hereinabove, I set aside the findings of the ld. CIT(A) and direct the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty of Rs. 5,36,115/-.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Sec. 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961— Penalty — Assessing officer levied the penalty u/s 271 (1)(c), levy of penalty lie in the assessment order dated 18.03.2013 framed u/s 143(3) of the act. CIT (A) confirmed the penalty levied by the assessing officer. Notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 274 r.w.s 271(1)(c) of the Act to be bad in law as it did not specify which limb of section 271(1)(c) of the Act the penalty proceedings had been initiated i.e. whether for concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income.
Tribunal set aside the findings of CIT(Appeals) and direct the assessing officer to delete the penalty. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.VINAYAK REMEDIES LTD vs. Asstt. CIT. [2020] 23 ITCD Online 47 (DEL)

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.