Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

it is very clear that the period of limitation prescribed in s. 158BE of the Act excludes the period commencing from the date on which the AO directs the assessee to get his accounts audited viz., the date of the order under s. 142(2A) of the Act. The date of order or direction to get the accounts audited is important and not the date on which such order or direction under s. 142(2A) of the Act is served on the assessee or received by the assessee. In the present case, the order under s. 142(2A) of the Act was made by the assessing authority on 17th April, 2000 directing the assessee to get the special audit completed and furnished the report on or before 31st July, 2000. The difference between these two dates is 105 days. If these 105 days are added to the last date before which the audit report was furnished viz., 31st July, 2000, the date of assessment will get extended upto 13th Nov., 2000. The assessment for block period in the present case was made by the assessing authority admittedly on 13th Nov., 2000 itself and therefore apparently the said assessment is within limitation.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Sec. 142(2A) & 158BE of Income Tax Act, 1961— Search and seizure—The time period stipulated by the AO for completion of special audit would commence only from the date when the assessee is communicated and receives the order and not the date of the order and the outer time-limit of 180 days specified in the proviso has been fixed with reference to the date on which the direction under sub-s. (2A) of s. 142 is received by the assessee and not from the date of the passing of the order. Reason given by the learned Tribunal in its order for holding the block assessment order passed on 13th Nov., 2000 to be within limitation on the ground that though as per argument of the assessee, the limitation would have expired on 11th Nov., 2000 which was a Saturday and the following day i.e., 12th Nov., 2000 being a Sunday, the order passed on 13th Nov., 2000 would be saved, because of the said two non-working days is not the correct reasoning, but the order passed on 13th Nov., 2000 was even otherwise within limitation as per the clear provisions of the Act which excluded the period of a special audit from the date of issuance of directions on 17th April, 2000 till 31st July, 2000 = 105 days which extended the limitation for completing the assessment upto 13th Nov., 2000 per se, therefore, even though the reason assigned by the Tribunal for holding the assessment to be within limitation is incorrect, but the conclusion arrived at by the learned Tribunal is legally sustainable conclusion as per the interpretation of the provisions of the Act — A.P. Shanmugaraj vs. DY. CIT [2020] 313 CTR 225 (MAD)

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.