Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

The Learned Counsel of the assessee argued that in thecaseof the assessee the transaction of the royalty expenses between the assessee and its Associated Enterprises (AEs), is international transaction and therefore its arm’s-length price can be determined only under the transfer pricing provisions and not under the provision of the section 40A(2)(b) of the Act. The contention of the Learned Counsel is that when there is specific provisions for dealing with the issue of expenses paid to related party under transfer pricing provisions, the general provisions under section 40A(2)(b) of the Act should not be invoked.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Sec. 40A of Income Tax Act, 1961—Business Disallowance - For invoking the provision of section 40A(2)(b), the Assessing Officer has to form an opinion of expenses more than the fair market value or not according to the legitimate needs of the business or no benefit derived and in the case of assessee, the Assessing Officer has only compared royalty expenses of the preceding assessment year and no efforts have been made for identifying the fair market value of such expenses during relevant period, which is one of the requirement for invoking the provisions of section 40A(2)(b) and under transfer pricing provisions the arm’s-length price is compared with similar transactions, though the provisions of section 40A(2)(b) are general provision as compared to the specific provisions of the transfer pricing, the Assessing Officer was required to compare the royalty expenses paid in case of the similar product by other companies during the relevant period and the Assessing Officer has not done any such exercise and only made basis of expenses paid in earlier years, thus, the disallowance made out of royalty expenses was deleted. - DE DIAMOND ELECTRIC INDIA PVT. LTD. V/s ASSTT. CIT - [2020] 207 TTJ 359 (ITAT-DELHI)