Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

We do not find any reason to interfere with the order of CIT(A) upholding the addition on account of bogus purchases to the extent of 12.5% less G.P. already declared by the assessee in the last purchase.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Section 69C of Income Tax Act, 1961—Bogus purchase— the revenue is aggrieved by the action of the ld. CIT(A) for restricting the addition on account of bogus purchases to the extent of 12.5% of such purchases.

Held that— The order passed by CIT(A) after considering the remand report is very reasoned order. Accordingly, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order of CIT(A) upholding the addition on account of bogus purchases to the extent of 12.5% less G.P. already declared by the assessee in the last purchase.[DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7 (3) , MUMBAI VERSUS M/S K. AMISHKUMAR TRADING PVT. LTD. AND (VICE-VERSA)][2019] 17 ITCD Online (36) [ ITAT MUMBAI]

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.