Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

The facts of the case are that the Appellant had filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 2009-10, on 31 July 2009 declaring total income of Rs. 1,30,49,400/-. The Appellant’s case was selected for scrutiny. For the Assessment Year under consideration the Appellant had sold certain immovable properties and received a sum of Rs. 1,75,00,000/-. The cost of acquisition of the land was adopted by the assessee at Rs. 9,30,000/- after claiming cost of commission of Rs. 3,50,000/- and also claimed cost of improvement of Rs. 15,50,000/-. The assessee claimed exemption under section 54F of the Act at Rs. 32,50,000/- for construction of residential house. The assessee’s claim was rejected as the Assessing Officer noting that the land on which the assessee had claimed to build the residential house was in the name of his mother. The commencement and completion certificate issued by the Nashik Municipal Corporation was also in the name of the mother of Appellant-assessee

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Section 54F of Income Tax Act, 1961—In the instant case the assessee claimed exemption under section 54F of the Act at Rs. 32,50,000/- for construction of residential house. The assessee’s claim was rejected as the Assessing Officer noting that the land on which the assessee had claimed to build the residential house was in the name of his mother. The commencement and completion certificate issued by the Nashik Municipal Corporation was also in the name of the mother of Appellant-assessee. The Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal upheld the view of the Assessing Officer.

Held that— The Commissioner (Appeals) followed the decision of Nagpur Bench of this Court in the case of Prakash vs. Income-Tax Officer and others – [2009] 312 ITR 40 (Bom). In this case where the Assessee purchased the property in the name of adopted son and not on his own name, he was denied the benefit. The Appeal is accordingly dismissed.[SANJAY L. SONAVANE VERSUS THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2, NASHIK] [2020] 21 ITCD Online (9) [BOMBAY HIGH COURT]

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.