Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

The learned CIT(A) has duly taken all the above facts into consideration while holding and, in our considered opinion, rightly so, that the penalty order was barred by the limitation prescribed by the provisions of section 275(1)(a) of the I.T. Act. 

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Section 271(1)(c) & 275 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 — Penalty — Concealment Penalty—In terms of provisions of section 275(1)(a), the penalty order should have been passed within six months from the end of the month in which the order of the Tribunal was received by the Department, however,  the order giving effect to the Tribunal's order was dated September 24, 2014, which meant that the order was received by the Department in the month of September  and if September 24,2014 was taken as the date on which the order of the Tribunal was received by the Department penalty under section 271(1)(c) could be levied upto March 31, 2015, however, the AO had levied the penalty under section 271(1)(c) on January 27, 2016, which proved that the penalty order was barred by limitation— Income tax Officer vs. APS Academy [2019] 75 ITR (trib) 563 (Lucknow)

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.