Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

Before the ld CIT(A) the assessee submitted that cash has been deposited out of professional service fees , out of opening cash balance available and sums received from a partnership firm where she is a partner i.e. Priyadarshi Hospital. The assessee also supported that with computation of income and statement of affairs as on 31.03.2010. The LD CIT (A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee as the ledger account submitted of Priyadarshini Hospital (Firm) were unauthenticated and on the ledger account PAN was not mentioned. The cash deposited therefore, were held to be not correlated hence, and confirmed the addition. The assessee aggrieved with the above order has preferred this appeal before Tribunal.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Sec. 68 & 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961— Reassessment —SARITA TYAGI, SATISH CHAND TYAGI vs. ITO.[2020] 25 ITCD Online 041 (ITAT-DELHI)