Latest Income-Tax Details

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on Income Tax
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our Income-Tax Library

Before the Tribunal, the Revenue could not adduce any cogent material or evidence to prove that the addition in all the assessment years was made in the case of Assessee in the Assessment completed under Section 144 read with section 153C of the Act on the basis of any incriminating material or document being found during the course of the search. It is further noticed that even no such incriminating material or document has been referred to by the Assessing Officer during the course of the search while completing Assessment. The order passed by the Assessing Officer has been passed in contravention of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case ofCalcutta Kintwears(supra).Therefore, the appeal preferred by the Assessee was rightly allowed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the appeal preferred by the Revenue was rightly dismissed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.

Section 153C read with section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – Search and Seizure – Addition made was unjustified as revenue could not adduce any cogent material or evidence to prove that addition in case of assessee in assessment completed under section 144 read with section 153C was on basis of any incriminating material or document found during course of Search– Principal Commissioner of income tax vs. Star PVG Exports [2020] 268 Taxman 357(Karnataka)

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.