Goods in Transit — The petitioner challenged the detention order as well as demand order of tax as well as penalty saying that the impugned order is per se illegal and against the provisions of the GST Act. Case was postponed for next date and by way of interim order, the respondents were directed that in the meantime, if the petitioner complies with the provisions of Rule 140 (1) of GST and CGST Rules, 2017, his seized goods and vehicle shall be released. — Super Construction Co. Vs. State of U.P. And 2 Others [2020] 20 TAXLOK.COM 047 (Allahabad)