The petitioner is before this Court seeking to cancel the bail granted by this Court to the accused. This court do not find any reason to entertain the petition.
Section 132 of the CGST Act, 2017— Anticipatory Bail - The petitioner department sought to cancel the bail granted by this Court to the respondent / accused vide order dated 11.06.2020. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent was granted conditional order of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 11.06.2020. As per condition No.4, the respondent herein was required to co-operate during the course of enquiry and to appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called for further investigation. But the respondent is not co-operating in the Investigation. He is making baseless allegations against the Investigating Officer. The counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondent is ready and willing to co-operate with the Investigating Officer. He is also ready to appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called for further investigation. Since there was ill-treatment by the Investigating Officer, he was made to file a complaint against the Investigating Officer. The court observed that they do not find any reason to entertain the petition.
Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court directed the respondent to appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called for investigation.
The petitioner is before this Court seeking to cancel the bail granted by this Court to the accused. This court do not find any reason to entertain the petition.
Section 132 of the CGST Act, 2017— Anticipatory Bail - The petitioner department sought to cancel the bail granted by this Court to the respondent / accused vide order dated 11.06.2020. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent was granted conditional order of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 11.06.2020. As per condition No.4, the respondent herein was required to co-operate during the course of enquiry and to appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called for further investigation. But the respondent is not co-operating in the Investigation. He is making baseless allegations against the Investigating Officer. The counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondent is ready and willing to co-operate with the Investigating Officer. He is also ready to appear before the Investigating Officer whenever called for further investigation. Since there was ill-treatment by the Investigating Officer, he was made to file a complaint against the Investigating Officer. The court observed that they do not find any reason to entertain the petition.
Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court directed the respondent to appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called for investigation.