Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The provisions of the said Section 171 (3A) shows that it has been inserted in the CGST Act, 2017 w.e.f. 01.01.2020 vide Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2019 and it was not in operation during the period from 01.07.2017 to 31.12.2018 when the Respondent has committed the above violation and hence the penalty under Section 171 (3A) can not be imposed on the Respondent for such period.

Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017— Anti- Profiteering – The DGAP submitted its report and concluded that the Respondent benefitted additional ITC of 3.64% of the turnover. Therefore, in terms of Section 171, the benefit of such additional ITC was required to be passed on by the Respondent to the respective recipients. The Authority observed found no reason to differ from the detailed computation of profiteering in the DGAP's Report and further observed that the Respondent has profiteered by an amount of Rs. 6,89,62,698/- during the period under present investigation i.e. 1.07.2017 to 31.12.2018,, which was required to be passed on to recipients.

Held that:- The Hon’ble Anti-Profiteering Authority directed the Respondents to   pass on the profiteered amount along with the interest @ 18% per annum, within a period of 3 months. However, since the provisions of Section 171 (3A) have come into force w.e.f 01.01.2020 and the period of investigation is w.e.f. 01.07.2017 to 31.12.2018, therefore, penalty cannot be imposed on the Respondent retrospectively.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.