Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

It is settled law that successive writ petitions for the same cause of action are not maintainable and all questions which could have been taken or ought to have taken and if not decided would be deemed to have been adjudicated or declined. This apart the seized goods of the petitioner have already been released.

Writ Petition — The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for quashing the order passed by respondent and has prayed that he may not proceed any further in pursuance thereof.
Held that—In view of the dismissal of the above writ petition the matter with regard to challenge to the order dated 31.1.2018 as has been made in this petition has come to an end. In case we allow the petitioner to challenge the said order in this writ petition it would amount to filing of successive writ petitions for one of the causes of action involved in the earlier writ petition.
It is settled law that successive writ petitions for the same cause of action are not maintainable and all questions which could have been taken or ought to have taken and if not decided would be deemed to have been adjudicated or declined. This apart the seized goods of the petitioner have already been released. — Integrated Tech 9 Labs Private Limited Vs. State of U.P. And 2 Others [2018] 6 TAXLOK.COM 67 (All)