Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

Distributor has no contral over increase in prices made by companies.

Anti-Profiteering — Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017— The petitioner has been asked to pay Rs.6,06,752/- by the order of the National Anti-Profiteering Authority. The Petitioner is a distributor of the products of M/s Patanjali Ayurveda Limited and it is PAL which has increased its base price over which Petitioner has no control. The Court observed that the Petitioner has made out a prima facie case for grant of interim relief.
Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court stayed the order and directed the Petitioner to pay Rs. 3 lacs within four weeks. Further directed to list the matter on 3rd February, 2020.—Satya Enterprises Vs. Union of India And Ors [2019] 14 TAXLOK.COM 086 (Delhi)

Join Whats App Group
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Product Demo
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
whatsapp with taxlok SUBSCRIBE OUR MAGAZINE

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE