The view expressed in the impugned judgment is kept in abeyance and it cannot be followed in other cases till the issue is finally answered/decided by this Court.
The appellant challenged the provisional attachment orders passed under section 83 of the Act, 2017. In the impugned orders, it is stated that the attachment was being made during the pendency of proceedings under Section 67 of the Act whereas no proceedings were pending under Section 67. The court on the issue of interim relief observed that the view expressed in the impugned judgment is kept in abeyance and it cannot be followed in other cases till the issue is finally answered/decided by this Court.
Held that:- The Hon’ble Supreme Court listed the matter after two weeks.
The view expressed in the impugned judgment is kept in abeyance and it cannot be followed in other cases till the issue is finally answered/decided by this Court.
The appellant challenged the provisional attachment orders passed under section 83 of the Act, 2017. In the impugned orders, it is stated that the attachment was being made during the pendency of proceedings under Section 67 of the Act whereas no proceedings were pending under Section 67. The court on the issue of interim relief observed that the view expressed in the impugned judgment is kept in abeyance and it cannot be followed in other cases till the issue is finally answered/decided by this Court.
Held that:- The Hon’ble Supreme Court listed the matter after two weeks.