+91-09001929869, 08949770324
Shopping Bag (
0
)
Visitors
3
6
2
6
3
6
8
Menu
Home
About Us
Contact Us
Products
Tax Library
SUBSCRIBE OUR MAGAZINE
GST UPDATE
(A fortnightly magazine in English)
INCOME TAX CASES DIGEST
(A fortnightly magazine in English)
INCOME TAX AND COMPANY LAW UPDATE
(A monthly magazine in Hindi)
GOODS AND SERVICE TAX UPDATE
(A monthly magazine in Hindi)
BUSINESS FUNDA
GST PROCEDURES WITH READY RECKONER
Latest GST Judgments
For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library
I reckon that, in the interest of justice, the authorities will keep the Bank Guarantee untouched till the Ext.P9 is considered.
Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.
Imposition of Penalty —
Suspecting tax evasion, the authorities detained the goods and demanded penalty, as well as tax. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed W.P.(c) NO. 36238 of 2018. In terms of judgment passed in said writ petition, the petitioner furnished bank guarantee for the entire amount demanded, and had the goods released. Authority completed the adjudication by imposing penalty, and appropriating the bank guarantee too. Petitioner filed appeal against the same. Petitioner apprehends that the authorities may encash the bank guarantee. Respondents will keep the bank guarantee untouched till said appeal is considered. — Vinod P.A. Vs. Assistant State Tax Officer State Goods And Services Tax Department, Perinthalmanna, State of Kerala, State Goods And Service Tax Department, Thiruvananthapuram, Commissioner (GST) , Government of India, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi, State Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) , Cochin And The Federal Bank Ltd. [2019] 8 TAXLOK.COM 002 (Ker)
I reckon that, in the interest of justice, the authorities will keep the Bank Guarantee untouched till the Ext.P9 is considered.
Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.
Imposition of Penalty —
Suspecting tax evasion, the authorities detained the goods and demanded penalty, as well as tax. Aggrieved, the petitioner filed W.P.(c) NO. 36238 of 2018. In terms of judgment passed in said writ petition, the petitioner furnished bank guarantee for the entire amount demanded, and had the goods released. Authority completed the adjudication by imposing penalty, and appropriating the bank guarantee too. Petitioner filed appeal against the same. Petitioner apprehends that the authorities may encash the bank guarantee. Respondents will keep the bank guarantee untouched till said appeal is considered. — Vinod P.A. Vs. Assistant State Tax Officer State Goods And Services Tax Department, Perinthalmanna, State of Kerala, State Goods And Service Tax Department, Thiruvananthapuram, Commissioner (GST) , Government of India, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi, State Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) , Cochin And The Federal Bank Ltd. [2019] 8 TAXLOK.COM 002 (Ker)
SUBSCRIBE OUR LIBRARIES
TOUR OF OUR GST ONLINE LIBRARY
TOUR OF OUR IT ONLINE LIBRARY
GST LIBRARY
INCOME-TAX LIBRARY