Since the location of the applicant, who is supplier of services, is in Gujarat and both the supplier of service as well as the place of supply of service is in Gujarat, the supply of services would be considered akin to intra-state supply of services and would be liable to CGST and SGST
Levy of GST—In this case, the moot point to be decided is as to whether the services provided by the applicant are liable to CGST and SGST or IGST? For this, we first need to know the nature of the transaction carried out by the applicant. As per the submission of the applicant, they have entered into an agreement with UKIL Machinery Co. Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of Republic of Korea to sell their machinery in the Indian Territory. The applicant was appointed as its exclusive sales agent for the sizing/warping machinery and/or components and supplies for the territory of India.
The applicant against the said service received commission income from Korea in foreign currency.
Held that— since the location of the applicant, who is supplier of services, is in Gujarat and both the supplier of service as well as the place of supply of service is in Gujarat, the supply of services would be considered akin to intra-state supply of services and would be liable to CGST and SGST as per the provisions of Section 9(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 for the services provided as an “intermediary”.
Since the location of the applicant, who is supplier of services, is in Gujarat and both the supplier of service as well as the place of supply of service is in Gujarat, the supply of services would be considered akin to intra-state supply of services and would be liable to CGST and SGST
Levy of GST—In this case, the moot point to be decided is as to whether the services provided by the applicant are liable to CGST and SGST or IGST? For this, we first need to know the nature of the transaction carried out by the applicant. As per the submission of the applicant, they have entered into an agreement with UKIL Machinery Co. Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of Republic of Korea to sell their machinery in the Indian Territory. The applicant was appointed as its exclusive sales agent for the sizing/warping machinery and/or components and supplies for the territory of India.
The applicant against the said service received commission income from Korea in foreign currency.
Held that— since the location of the applicant, who is supplier of services, is in Gujarat and both the supplier of service as well as the place of supply of service is in Gujarat, the supply of services would be considered akin to intra-state supply of services and would be liable to CGST and SGST as per the provisions of Section 9(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 for the services provided as an “intermediary”.