Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The appellant has not submitted the required documents as per Rule 89(2) of CGST Rules, 2017 in absence of which eligibility of refund cannot be determined. Accordingly, there is no reason to interfere with the decision taken by the adjudicating authority vide "impugned orders”.

Section 54 of the CGST Act — Refund — The appellant filed refund claim on account of Supplies to SEZ unit/SEZ Developer with payment of tax. The adjudicating authority vide impugned orders rejected the refund claims on the basis of non-submission of required documents physically in support of claim and non-submission of original copy of declaration by SEZ unit/SEZ Developer mentioning that they have not availed any ITC on the same supplies. The authority observed that a deficiency memo was issued for refund application and the appellant has not submitted any documents in respect of deficiency. There is no force in the contentions of the appellant in respect of their claim.

Held that:- The Hon’ble authority rejected the appeal.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.