Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

In the present case, since the project itself was launched after implementation of GST w.e.f. 01.07.2017, there was no pre-GST tax rate or ITC availability that could be compared with the post-GST tax rate and ITC, to determine whether there was any benefit that was required to be passed on by way of reduced price. The provisions of section l71 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 does not get attracted in the present case.

Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017— Anti- Profiteering – The DGAP submitted its report and concluded that the allegation of profiteering by way of not passing on the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax or the benefit of ITC did not stand confirmed against the Respondent and therefore, provisions of Section 171(1) of the Act was not applicable. The authority observed that there was no pre-GST tax rate or ITC structure which could be compared with the post-GST tax rate and ITC structure and therefore, the provisions of Section 171 (1) were not applicable against the Respondent’s project.

Held that:- The Hon’ble Anti-Profiteering Authority concurred with the findings of the DGAP.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.