Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The Respondent has not contravened the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 and we find no merit in the instant case and the same is accordingly dismissed.

Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017— Anti- Profiteering – The Applicant DGAP has reported that the project has been registered in post-GST era, booking and receipt of payments had taken place post introduction of GST, there was no pre-GST tax rate or input tax credit structure which could be compared with the post-GST tax rate and input tax credit. The provisions of Section 171(1) of the Act, 2017, relating to profiteering, would not be attracted. Further, the project "Aangan, Phase-III" was yet to be launched and had not been registered with RERA till date. The authority observed that instant case does not fall under the ambit of Anti-Profiteering provisions of Section 171.

Held that:- The Hon’ble Anti-Profiteering Authority dismissed the application being not maintainable.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.