Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

As much as the defects did not subsist on the date of passing of order of detention, the detention cannot be said to be justified for the purpose of Section 129 of the GST Act. Accordingly, this court quashed and directs the respondents to release the goods belonging to the petitioner on the petitioner producing a copy of this judgment before the respondents.

Section 129 of the CGST Act, 2017 — Goods in Transit -- The petitioner challenged order of detention, on the ground that Part B of the e-way bill was not updated or generated at the time of inspection. A notice of inspection was issued on 6.11.2020 and a notice have been served to the petitioner scheduling the inspection of the goods on 11.11.2020, the detention order in FORM GST MOV-6 was issued to the petitioner on 18.11.2020. The court observed that in the meanwhile, between the date of apprehending the goods and the date on which the order of detention was passed, the e-way bill had already been updated by filling the Part B thereof. The defects did not subsist on the date of passing of order of detention, the detention cannot be said to be justified for the purpose of Section 129 of the Act.

Held that:-The Hon’ble High Court quashed the order, notice and directed the respondents to release the goods to the petitioner.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.