The present proceedings are found to have been terminated by the Supreme Court. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed.
Section 129 of the CGST Act, 2017 — Goods in Transit —–The petitioner prayed for direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the Seizure order dated 15.02.2018 passed under Section 129(1) of the Act 2017 and consequential notice dated 15.02.2018, issued by respondent no. 4 under Section 129(3) of the Act, 2017. The respondent counsel submitted that in identical matter the issue travelled to the Supreme Court as Special Leave Petition (C) No.25291 of 2019, wherein the Supreme Court held that this order is being passed to cover all cases of seizure during the relevant period, to obviate inconsistency in application of Law and also to do away with multiple appeals required to be filed by the State/assessee to assail the unstable orders/directions passed by the High Court in subject writ petition(s) referred to in the affidavit filed by the State before this Court. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to institute and/or pursue the statutory remedy of appeal against the order impugned in the present petition. The counsel for the State has no objection to the same. The court observed that the present proceedings are found to have been terminated by the Supreme Court.
Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the present petition.
The present proceedings are found to have been terminated by the Supreme Court. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed.
Section 129 of the CGST Act, 2017 — Goods in Transit —–The petitioner prayed for direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the Seizure order dated 15.02.2018 passed under Section 129(1) of the Act 2017 and consequential notice dated 15.02.2018, issued by respondent no. 4 under Section 129(3) of the Act, 2017. The respondent counsel submitted that in identical matter the issue travelled to the Supreme Court as Special Leave Petition (C) No.25291 of 2019, wherein the Supreme Court held that this order is being passed to cover all cases of seizure during the relevant period, to obviate inconsistency in application of Law and also to do away with multiple appeals required to be filed by the State/assessee to assail the unstable orders/directions passed by the High Court in subject writ petition(s) referred to in the affidavit filed by the State before this Court. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to institute and/or pursue the statutory remedy of appeal against the order impugned in the present petition. The counsel for the State has no objection to the same. The court observed that the present proceedings are found to have been terminated by the Supreme Court.
Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the present petition.