Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

It is made clear that the respondents have not considered the reply, dated 25.02.2022, even though the same was received by them, the impugned order, dated 05.04.2022 has to be quashed and the matter will have to be remanded back to the respondents for fresh consideration on merits and in accordance with law.

Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017— Demand Notice —-- The petitioner challenged the impugned order dated 05.04.2022 passed under Section 74 of the Act on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice. The petitioner contended that even though they have sent a reply dated 25.02.2022 to the SCN but the same has not been considered in the impugned order. Further, only a summary of the order dated 05.04.2022 was served on him and not the detailed order. The Additional Government Pleader confirmed that the reply dated 25.02.2022 sent by the petitioner was received by the respondents. The court observed that as seen from the impugned order, there is no reference to the reply dated 25.02.2022 and the said reply has also not been considered.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court quashed the impugned order, dated 05.04.2022 and remanded the matter back to the respondents for fresh consideration on merits and in accordance with law. The respondent is directed to pass final orders, within a period of twelve weeks, after adhering to the principles of natural justice and after affording a personal hearing to the petitioner.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.