Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The grievance of the petitioner is that, the provisions of Section 42(3) read with Rule 36 of the CGST Rules has not been complied with by the assessing officer while issuing Ext.P4.

Section 42 of the CGST Act, 2017 — Procedure not followed -- The petitioner challenged the order of assessment dated 14.03.2022 alleging the short assessment and input tax credit wrongly availed. The petitioner submitted that the provisions of Section 42(3) read with Rule 36 have not been complied with. Further, reasonable opportunity of hearing was not granted before issuing order thereby violating the principles of natural justice. The court observed that the petitioner has an effective remedy before the appellate authority. The circumstances of the case, including the grant of opportunity for hearing before issuing the impugned order, does not warrant an interference of this Court under Article 226 of the constitution of India.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the writ petition, reserving the liberty of the petitioner to raise all contentions advanced in this writ petition before the appellate authority.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.