Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

Petitioner has challenged an order raising a demand. This order is passed on the ground that the petitioner had not declared its godown as an additional place of business. Case of the petitioner is that impugned order was passed without any notice to the petitioner and in any case, the petitioner has declared the godown as an additional place of business. By way of ad-interim relief, impugned order is stayed.

Declaration of additional place of business —–-- The petitioner challenged an order dated 09.03.2021, passed on the ground that the petitioner had not declared its godown as an additional place of business. The petitioner submitted that in the prescribed form under the GST there is no column for mentioning a godown separately and, therefore, the petitioner had given the address of the godown as an additional place of business. The Court observed that the impugned order was not issued on the ground of violation of the principles of natural justice.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court set aside the order and directed that the respondents are at liberty to issue a fresh notice upon the petitioner.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.