Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

In the notice neither the name nor the designation of the issuing authority was mentioned, nor any details were given as to on what grounds fraud was alleged against the petitioner. It was submitted that notice was vague and did not reveal any specific ground to proceed against the petitioner.

Section 29 of the CGST Act, 2017— Cancellation of GST Registration -– The petitioner challenged SCN dated 20.6.2022. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that no documentary material was relied on in substantiation of one line cryptic reason mentioned in the notice. The opportunity to defend ought to have been given to the petitioner. The court observed that subsequent to filling of the petition, the detailed SCN was delivered to the petitioner. Therefore, the ground raised in the petition, no longer remained available to be advanced.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court set aside the impugned notice dated 20.6.2022 and directed that the petitioner shall be given time till 15th April, 2023 to submit its reply. The date of personal hearing within this period may also be fixed. The decision shall be rendered by the competent authority within three weeks from the date when the hearing is completed.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.