Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner had given an application to the first respondent to consider his representation of giving input credit for the extended days as per Section 140(5) of the CGST Act, 2017. The first respondent is directed to consider the petitioner's representation.

Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017 – Transitional Credit –––- The petitioner sought direction to the first respondent to consider and pass order on the petition/application, dated 12.05.2022 under Section 140(5) of the Act. The petitioner had given an application on 12.05.2022 to consider his representation of giving ITC for the extended days as per Section 140(5). The second respondent had issued a SCN disallowing credit for 20 invoices to the tune of Rs.23,71,301/-. The Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that it is only a SCN and if he has got any evidence, he has produce the relevant records and reply to the SCN. If the contention of the petitioner is reasonable, the same would be accepted, otherwise, further action it would be taken.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court disposed the petition in view of the submission made by the Standing Counsel. Further, directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation within a period of three weeks and inform the petitioner about the outcome of the same.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.