+91-09001929869
Shopping Bag (
0
)
Visitors
3
2
7
8
2
0
6
Menu
Home
About Us
Contact Us
Products
Tax Library
SUBSCRIBE OUR MAGAZINE
GST UPDATE
(A fortnightly magazine in English)
INCOME TAX CASES DIGEST
(A fortnightly magazine in English)
INCOME TAX AND COMPANY LAW UPDATE
(A monthly magazine in Hindi)
GOODS AND SERVICE TAX UPDATE
(A monthly magazine in Hindi)
BUSINESS FUNDA
GST PROCEDURES WITH READY RECKONER
Latest GST Judgments
For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library
High Court upholds jurisdiction of Mumbai CGST Commissionerate even in case where parallel proceedings were commenced in Jaipur
Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.
Jurisdiction under GST —
In the instant case, During the period of dispute, the assessee, an individual, was subjected to enquiry proceedings under CGST Act, initiated by the Commissionerate at Mumbai. He was issued summons in this regard, u/s 14 of the CEA 1944 and Section 70 of the CGST Act. The Assessee claimed that he was already facing enquiry by the GST authorities at Jaipur Commissionerate. Accordingly, he filed the present writ, contesting that two parallel proceedings running against him.Held that— The Assessee is registered at Mumbai & is subject to jurisdiction of the Mumbai Commissionerate. Merely because the Assessee has his primary business at Jaipur, this does not determine the issue of jurisdiction. Moreover, Section 25 of the CGST Act provides for separate registration for each state. Hence where both registration taken & services rendered are at Mumbai, the Assessee is subject to jurisdiction of Mumbai Commissionerate. Thus no intervention is warranted in the proceedings launched by it. — Shafi Khan Khokhar Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. [2018] 7 TAXLOK.COM 039 (Bombay)
High Court upholds jurisdiction of Mumbai CGST Commissionerate even in case where parallel proceedings were commenced in Jaipur
Shanti Prime Publication Pvt. Ltd.
Jurisdiction under GST —
In the instant case, During the period of dispute, the assessee, an individual, was subjected to enquiry proceedings under CGST Act, initiated by the Commissionerate at Mumbai. He was issued summons in this regard, u/s 14 of the CEA 1944 and Section 70 of the CGST Act. The Assessee claimed that he was already facing enquiry by the GST authorities at Jaipur Commissionerate. Accordingly, he filed the present writ, contesting that two parallel proceedings running against him.Held that— The Assessee is registered at Mumbai & is subject to jurisdiction of the Mumbai Commissionerate. Merely because the Assessee has his primary business at Jaipur, this does not determine the issue of jurisdiction. Moreover, Section 25 of the CGST Act provides for separate registration for each state. Hence where both registration taken & services rendered are at Mumbai, the Assessee is subject to jurisdiction of Mumbai Commissionerate. Thus no intervention is warranted in the proceedings launched by it. — Shafi Khan Khokhar Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. [2018] 7 TAXLOK.COM 039 (Bombay)
SUBSCRIBE OUR LIBRARIES
TOUR OF OUR GST ONLINE LIBRARY
TOUR OF OUR IT ONLINE LIBRARY
GST LIBRARY
INCOME-TAX LIBRARY