There is no necessity to intervene at this juncture and it is appropriate that the matter be resolved in accordance with law.
Notice of Demand –––– The petitioner prayed for mandamus calling for and quashing notice of demand through electronic mails dated 25.10.2019, 27.11.2019, 12.03.2020, 04.05.2020 and 06.05.2020. The court observed that these are only e-mails issued by the respondent calling for payment of interest, one of which the petitioner has replied to. It would be appropriate for this conversation to continue and the respondents to hear the party to arrive at a proper reconciliation of the amount to be paid, if any. There is no necessity to intervene at this juncture and it is appropriate that the matter be resolved by them, in accordance with law.
Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court, disposed the writ petition.
There is no necessity to intervene at this juncture and it is appropriate that the matter be resolved in accordance with law.
Notice of Demand –––– The petitioner prayed for mandamus calling for and quashing notice of demand through electronic mails dated 25.10.2019, 27.11.2019, 12.03.2020, 04.05.2020 and 06.05.2020. The court observed that these are only e-mails issued by the respondent calling for payment of interest, one of which the petitioner has replied to. It would be appropriate for this conversation to continue and the respondents to hear the party to arrive at a proper reconciliation of the amount to be paid, if any. There is no necessity to intervene at this juncture and it is appropriate that the matter be resolved by them, in accordance with law.
Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court, disposed the writ petition.