Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

The order is quashed and set aside. The respondent is directed to consider the refund application on its own merits and in accordance with law expeditiously without being influenced by the observation made in the impugned order passed by the Appellate Authority and the Assessing Officer.

Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017 – Refund - The petitioner prayed for a declaration that the Rule 90(3) is ultra vires the Constitution of India and also prayed for quashing the impugned order dated 30th April, 2021. The respondent passed an order dated 13th November, 2020 and rejected the petitioner’s refund application dated 14th October, 2020, on the ground as time bared. The Appellate Authority also dismissed the appeal vide order dated 30th April, 2021. The counsel for the petitioner relied the order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Cognizance for Extension of Limitation in Suo Motu Writ Petition. The court observed that the period of limitation falling between 15th March, 2020 to 2nd October, 2021 is required to be excluded. If the said period between 15th March, 2020 and 2nd October, 2021 is excluded, the third refund application filed by the petitioner was within the period of limitation prescribed under the said circular dated 19th November, 2029

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court quashed the impugned Order dated 30th April, 2021. And directed the respondent no.3 to consider the said third refund application on its own merits and in accordance with law expeditiously.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.