Latest GST Judgments

For Full Access To All Latest Judgments on GST
Click Here To Subscribe Now
Take a tour of our GST Library

Once the proceedings in respect of notice under Section 129(3) of CGST Act stood concluded in terms of Section 129(5) of the Act read with Rule 142(3) of CGST Rules, no mandamus can be issued to the respondent to pass an order under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act.

Section 129 of the CGST Act, 2017 — Goods in Transit —–The petitioner prayed for directions to the respondent to pass consequential orders under Section 129(3). The petitioner is a consignor of certain goods. While goods were in transit, the same were intercepted on 17.1.2022. The petitioner deposited the amount demanded under notice under Section 129(3) and the respondent issued an order dated 27.1.2022 and released the goods and vehicle. The court observed that proceedings in respect of the aforesaid notice under Section 129(3) stood concluded in terms of mandate of sub-section (5) of Section 129. Hence, relief sought by the petitioner cannot be granted since the matter is concluded as per legislative mandate.

Held that:- The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the writ petition.

Professional services available Audit Management
Tax Lok English Viedo
Tax Lok Hindi Viedo
Check Your Tax Knowledge
Youtube
HR Consulting services

FOR FREE CONDUCTED TOUR OF OUR ON-LINE LIBRARIES WITH OUR REPRESENTATIVE-- CLICK HERE

FOR ANY SUPPORT ON GST/INCOME TAX

Do You Want To Take FREE DEMO Of Our GST/Income Tax Library.